Original Research
Weak central coherence is a syndrome of autism spectrum disorder during teacher–learner task instructions
Submitted: 18 June 2019 | Published: 14 December 2020
About the author(s)
Petronella S. de Jager, Department of Education, Faculty of Education, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South AfricaJanet Condy, Literacy Development, Faculty of Education, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa
Abstract
Background: Whilst it is known that weak central coherence (WCC) and global information processing (GIP) challenges contribute to teacher–learner task instruction challenges in learners with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), there are limited data on how teachers in inclusive classrooms respond. Weak central coherence and GIP behaviours manifest in classrooms when learners with ASD focus narrowly on minute detail whilst ignoring teachers’ instructions.
Aim: The aim of the study was to describe three case studies of teacher–ASD learner verbal interactions during task instructions in inclusive classrooms.
Setting: Three Grade 3, 9-year-old learners and their teachers were purposively sampled. The learners had been clinically diagnosed with ASD by an independent clinical educational psychologist. The learners’ schools, one government inclusive mainstream and one private school, were located in the Western Cape, South Africa.
Methods: An interpretive qualitative case study design was chosen with non-participant observations and individual semi-structured interviews. The data were inductively analysed.
Results: The learners with ASD struggled to comprehend the general classroom discussions and fixated on minute details. This obsessive behaviour was manifested in their inability to appreciate the global perspective of a situation. These tendencies often led to social isolation.
Conclusion: This study highlights a deeper level of misunderstanding during teacher–ASD learner verbal interactions during task instructions. Learners understood the immediate or literal meaning of the verbal instructions, but were persistently pre-occupied with only one part of their teachers’ instructions and persevered with smaller details. This study was limited to three learners with ASD, and more studies are required to confirm the results.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 4109Total article views: 7154
Crossref Citations
1. A Systematic Review of Independent Work Systems for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Zhigao Liang, Dana Patenaude, Shamaria Mosley, Jie Yang
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders year: 2025
doi: 10.1007/s40489-025-00528-8
2. A systematic review of digital activity schedule use in individuals with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability
Adelaide W. Hammond, Jared R. Morris, Terisa Gabrielsen, Timothy B. Smith, Nathaniel Medsker
Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability vol: 50 issue: 4 first page: 502 year: 2025
doi: 10.3109/13668250.2025.2499009
3. Square Pegs and Round Holes: Pedagogy for Autistic Students in Computing Education
Selina Marianna Shah, Catherine Elliott, Prema Nedungadi
IEEE Transactions on Education vol: 67 issue: 6 first page: 919 year: 2024
doi: 10.1109/TE.2023.3335395
4. The use of visual schedules to increase academic-related on-task behaviors of individuals with autism: a literature review
Zhigao Liang, David Lee, Juanjuan Zuo, Shuang Liang
International Journal of Developmental Disabilities first page: 1 year: 2024
doi: 10.1080/20473869.2024.2402124
5. A Literature Review of Video-Enhanced Activity Schedules for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Zhigao Liang, Shuang Liang, Juanjuan Zuo
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders year: 2025
doi: 10.1007/s40489-025-00492-3